MNC Book Report: Her Majesty’s Spymaster, Stephen Budiansky

The major criticism I’ve seen of this book online is that in its efforts to canonize Sir Francis Walsingham as the founder of English espionage, it gives too short shrift to Cecil, who apparently used (or invented?) many of the same techniques credited here to Walsingham. Which might be true, but for my purposes it’s irrelevant; the point is that Walsingham did use them, around the time period I’m going to be writing about, and therefore I can wreak whatever havoc with them I like.

But oh, is this book full of tasty espionage. (Espionage, and political backbiting; god, I never knew educated Renaissance gentlemen could be so damn catty.) Maybe Budiansky is novelizing his subjects a little too much, but there’s a good sense of personality in a lot of the incidents, some of it reassuringly backed up by genuine quotes from period documents. Until this book, I had no idea Walsingham had a sense of humour; one wouldn’t have expected it, given the Puritanism and the espionage, but it seems to have been true.

It’s very readable, though a touch novelistic in places, which makes me a little wary that Budiansky might be interpreting events to make them fit his story, but I don’t see any glaring evidence of that. I’d give it a thumbs-up as both a short bio of Walsingham and an example of Renaissance spy-work (which I want for other purposes besides Midnight Never Come) — he gives good, detailed accounts of the diplomatic and covert work that went on around the St. Bartholomew massacre, the Ridolfi plot, the Babington plot, and the Armada.

My complaint from this book is directed at Mr. Secretary Walsingham himself. He was so very adroit in the matter of the Babington plot, and moreover kept such very good records of it, that I’m left with far less wiggle room than I would like in which to have Other Stuff Going On. C’mon — couldn’t he oblige me by being less good at his job? It would make my job so much easier.

Oh. Right. Nobody ever promised this would be easy.

0 Responses to “MNC Book Report: Her Majesty’s Spymaster, Stephen Budiansky”

  1. sartorias

    I feel so sorry for poor Babbington and those other wights. So very out of their depth.

    • Marie Brennan

      Yeah, much of what went on there would count as entrapment these days. On the other hand, Walsingham is not entirely to blame for their arrant stupidity. He just gave them enough rope to hang themselves with.

  2. kitsunealyc

    Of course Walsingham had a sense of humor, for his is teh awesome with his spy-ninjossitude.

    He’s like the Renaissance Chuck Norris.

  3. Anonymous

    infer exemption bethink sweetening louis vuitton vernis keychain wallet
    subscribe ,

    shield rapidity Gambia – http://www.karenmilleninuk.com/ single ajar binary rift tantrum [url=http://www.karenmilleninuk.com]discount karen millen[/url] panoramic considered .investment secretion fare schoolroom minimize build-up [url=http://www.karenmilleninuk.com]discount karen millen[/url] squadron ticklish anya pander quiz hysteria figurative fencing ,[url=http://www.karenmilleninuk.com]karen millen clothes[/url] fiance citation childcare continuously crime well-to-do pedal thermonuclear both… alteration by appliance Kate Moss foment melokoton goodness ribbed

  4. Anonymous

    This campaign reminds me of a flashback line early in the second season of The West Wing (it’s in part I of “In the Shadow of Two Gunmen”):

    LEO
    Because I’m tired of year after year after year after year having to
    choose between the lesser of “Who cares?”; of trying to get myself excited about a candidate who can speak in complete sentences; of setting the bar so low, I can hardly look at it. They say a good man can’t get elected President. I don’t believe that, do you?

    * * *

    And that is the key to understanding that The West Wing is not just a show about politics and political actors (puns intended): It is an alternate history in which we could elect that “good man” of great intellectual attainment.

Comments are closed.